Categories
Weight Loss Products

Mycio Wealth Partners Has Lifted Disney Walt Co (DIS) Stake; NUTRAFUELS (NTFU) Shorts Decreased By 32%

The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) Logo

Mycio Wealth Partners Llc increased Disney Walt Co (DIS) stake by 35.84% reported in 2018Q3 SEC filing. Mycio Wealth Partners Llc acquired 4,493 shares as Disney Walt Co (DIS)’s stock rose 1.07%. The Mycio Wealth Partners Llc holds 17,031 shares with $1.99 million value, up from 12,538 last quarter. Disney Walt Co now has $171.81 billion valuation. The stock increased 0.84% or $0.96 during the last trading session, reaching $115.25. About 8.74 million shares traded or 6.78% up from the average. The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) has risen 6.27% since February 24, 2018 and is uptrending. It has outperformed by 6.27% the SP500. Some Historical DIS News: 31/05/2018 – Trump Wants Apology From Disney’s Iger Over 2017 Russia Report; 07/05/2018 – The Business Times: #Comcast prepares all-cash bid to gate-crash #Disney-Fox deal; 25/05/2018 – To @jimcramer, comparing Netflix and Disney is not particularly useful; 05/04/2018 – SAUDI CROWN PRINCE MET WITH WARNER BROS., DISNEY, MAGIC LEAP; 26/04/2018 – DISNEY SAYS NEW `AVENGERS’ OPENS WITH $39M INTERNATIONALLY; 08/05/2018 – ♫ Reuters Insider – Disney revenue up on ‘Black Panther’; 30/05/2018 – Trump wades into furor over racist Roseanne Barr tweet; 13/05/2018 – DISNEY: `AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR’ GLOBAL GBO $1.61B TO DATE; 19/04/2018 – Dolby and Disney Announce Extended Theatrical Collaboration; 29/03/2018 – ITALIA INDEPENDENT GROUP SPA IINT.Ml – HAS SIGNED LICENSE AGREEMENT TO MAKE DISNEY, MARVEL AND LUCAS FILM THEMED GLASSES

NUTRAFUELS INC (OTCMKTS:NTFU) had a decrease of 32% in short interest. NTFU’s SI was 8,500 shares in February as released by FINRA. Its down 32% from 12,500 shares previously. With 78,600 avg volume, 0 days are for NUTRAFUELS INC (OTCMKTS:NTFU)’s short sellers to cover NTFU’s short positions. The stock increased 11.44% or $0.0195 during the last trading session, reaching $0.19. About 375,178 shares traded or 816.95% up from the average. NutraFuels, Inc. (OTCMKTS:NTFU) has 0.00% since February 24, 2018 and is . It has by 0.00% the SP500.

More news for NutraFuels, Inc. (OTCMKTS:NTFU) were recently published by: Globenewswire.com, which released: “Freedom Leaf Inc. Announces National Distribution Agreement Other OTC:FRLF – GlobeNewswire” on February 28, 2018. Marketwired.com‘s article titled: “NutraFuels (NTFU) Files its Application to Up List to the OTCQB OTC Market – Marketwired” and published on January 29, 2018 is yet another important article.

NutraFuels, Inc. manufactures and distributes oral spray nutritional and dietary products to retail and wholesale outlets. The company has market cap of $20.20 million. The companyÂ’s products include sleep spray to support a healthy sleep cycle and improve the quality of restful sleep; energize spray to enhance energy, and restore vigor and vitality; and garcinia cambogia spray, an appetite and weight management spray. It currently has negative earnings. It also offers NRG-X extreme energy spray to enhance energy and stamina; headache and pain spray to relieve headaches and pain; and hair, skin, and nails spray to nourish and encourage hair, skin, and nail growth.

Since September 4, 2018, it had 0 buys, and 16 selling transactions for $11.46 million activity. Shares for $5.73 million were sold by IGER ROBERT A. 29,192 shares valued at $3.44M were sold by Parker Mary Jayne on Wednesday, October 3. $124,178 worth of stock was sold by BRAVERMAN ALAN N on Friday, December 28. On Wednesday, February 6 the insider WOODFORD BRENT sold $227,200.

Among 6 analysts covering Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS), 5 have Buy rating, 0 Sell and 1 Hold. Therefore 83% are positive. Walt Disney had 6 analyst reports since October 15, 2018 according to SRatingsIntel. The stock of The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) has “Buy” rating given on Tuesday, February 19 by Macquarie Research. The stock has “Overweight” rating by Morgan Stanley on Monday, October 15. The firm earned “Market Perform” rating on Thursday, February 7 by BMO Capital Markets. Argus Research maintained the stock with “Buy” rating in Monday, November 12 report. The stock of The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) has “Buy” rating given on Tuesday, November 27 by Imperial Capital. The stock has “Overweight” rating by Barclays Capital on Friday, October 19.

Mycio Wealth Partners Llc decreased Alphabet Inc stake by 1,062 shares to 2,284 valued at $2.73 million in 2018Q3. It also reduced Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) stake by 6,122 shares and now owns 163,382 shares. Spdr Series Trust (SDY) was reduced too.

Investors sentiment increased to 1.27 in 2018 Q3. Its up 0.04, from 1.23 in 2018Q2. It improved, as 61 investors sold DIS shares while 549 reduced holdings. 149 funds opened positions while 628 raised stakes. 890.89 million shares or 8.78% less from 976.63 million shares in 2018Q2 were reported. Northrock invested in 3,160 shares. 4,090 are held by Freestone Company. Strategy Asset Managers Ltd Com owns 81,949 shares for 0% of their portfolio. Soros Fund Mngmt Ltd Llc invested in 0.77% or 299,000 shares. Old Second Bancorp Of Aurora invested 0.93% in The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS). Van Eck Corp stated it has 0.23% in The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS). Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd holds 0.01% of its portfolio in The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) for 9,135 shares. Highbridge Capital Mngmt Ltd Liability Com holds 37,195 shares. Dubuque State Bank Comm accumulated 40,047 shares. Mckinley Carter Wealth Incorporated invested in 0.53% or 15,346 shares. 1.82 million are held by Apg Asset Mngmt Nv. Addenda, Quebec – Canada-based fund reported 63,069 shares. Harvest invested in 5,738 shares. State Of Alaska Department Of Revenue stated it has 343,153 shares or 0.67% of all its holdings. Acadian Asset Mngmt Ltd Liability Corp, a Massachusetts-based fund reported 1.35 million shares.

More notable recent The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) news were published by: Seekingalpha.com which released: “YouTube ads pulled over exploitation fears – Seeking Alpha” on February 21, 2019, also Bizjournals.com with their article: “Disney (NYSE: DIS) shares new additions on way for Epcot theme park in Orlando – Orlando Business Journal – Orlando Business Journal” published on February 21, 2019, Seekingalpha.com published: “Disney: Forced To Transform Its Business – Seeking Alpha” on February 19, 2019. More interesting news about The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) were released by: Seekingalpha.com and their article: “Walt Disney Q1 2019 Earnings Preview – Seeking Alpha” published on February 04, 2019 as well as Seekingalpha.com‘s news article titled: “WarnerMedia talks late-2019 streaming plans – Seeking Alpha” with publication date: February 11, 2019.

The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) Institutional Positions Chart

Categories
Weight Loss Products

The truth about Garcinia and weight loss

garcinia cambogia weight lossgarcinia cambogia weight loss
Garcinia Cambogia fruit. Source: Pixabay ~ 
Related

We are all aware of the fact that slimming is a mega-dollar industry. With millions, if not billions of people of all ages struggling to lose weight, and very few pharmaceutically effective medications available to assist them, the desperate public will literally clutch at straws. 

Every week sees the launch of a new “miracle” diet pill or potion and a “surefire” diet guaranteed to help believers shed kilos like magic.

Recently Garcinia cambogia became the flavour of the year. If you search the internet for information on this exotic fruit extract you will be assured that this is finally the miracle we have all been waiting for, which will produce dramatic weight loss. Endorsements by various TV personalities and other luminaries have added to the allure of Garcinia cambogia slimming products.

According to a recent local study from the  Tshwane University of Technology (TUT) “this small fruit, reminiscent of a pumpkin in appearance, is currently most popularly used and widely advertised as a weight-loss supplement”. 

The good side

But just how effective is this plant for shedding the kilos? 

The comprehensive overview from TUT suggests that studies have shown that “the extracts as well as (-)-hydroxycitric acid (HCA), a main organic acid component of the fruit rind, exhibited anti-obesity activity”. It also regulates the serotonin levels related to satiety, leading to reduced food intake. 

“According to clinical trial reports, Garcinia extracts were beneficial to obese individuals in many cases. In addition, studies on the toxicity and observations during clinical trials indicate that Garcinia is safe to use. Most of the negative reports have been related to cases where multi ingredient formulations were consumed and the effect could not be attributed to a specific ingredient.”

The research does, however, caution against an increase in serotonin, especially in people who take medicines that are already increasing serotonin levels, such as SSRIs. Research into these effects has not been conducted. 

“Moreover, regulatory authorities should provide and enforce legislation requiring the compulsory basic safety demonstration of supplements pre-marketing and develop post-marketing surveillance systems,” the study concluded. 

The bad side

Dr Ingrid van Heerden, a registered dietitian, is of opinion that we should be cautious of Garcinia, since it has not undergone rigorous testing. What follows is reviewed information from her pen, including her final verdict:

Often, once a person who wants, or needs to lose weight, is hooked on the promise of a slim, sexy figure, they are sucked into the deception. If the drops, wafers or powders don’t work, well then it is the fault of the user who did not adhere to one or other often impossible instruction such as “stick to a 500 kcal/day diet” or “drink 5 litres of water a day”, never that of the diet pill. 

When eventually science and legislation catch up with the manufacturers, they calmly take product A off the market, change their formulation slightly, change the name to product B, and then blithely sell product B using the same advertising gambits as before, raking in the money and pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes all over again.

In keeping with the ever-changing slimming product ranges, there are what one can call “ingredients of the year” (sometimes an ingredient lasts for only three to six months, but some have longer life spans, and then of course some are resurrected every two to three years).

We have had apple cider vinegar (which has made many a comeback over the years), green tea (which has earned some merit in scientific studies), hoodia (which just does not manage to produce the research results that will make it a front-runner), willow bark (or salicylic acid which is good for aches and pains but not as efficacious for slimming), and good old caffeine (which has a diuretic effect thus helping you lose weight until you replenish the water in your body, and also a stimulant effect when taken in large quantities that can be potentially dangerous), to name but a few.

While it is perfectly possible that more extensive and well controlled scientific studies will reveal that an extract of Garcinia cambogia which contains a chemical called hydroxycitric acid (HCA) will assist weight loss, we are at present not yet sure how this tamarind or brindall berry or brindleberry or Garcinia gummi-gutta works, what side-effects it may or may not have and what dosage is required to achieve really significant weight loss.

But I hear you say: “For once we have a number of scientific studies that were carried out with Garcinia cambogia, so what’s the problem?”

Well some of the studies did not show any weight loss differences between patients who took Garcinia pills and those who took dummy pills, while other studies did show differences in weight loss with the subjects taking pills containing Garcinia losing slightly more weight than those that did not (Marquez et al, 2012).

Some of these weight loss differences were not exactly exciting either, so we can’t say for sure that Garcinia cambogia does promote weight loss. It also seems likely that this is not the wonder pill it is made out to be.

In addition, many of the studies conducted to date have been flawed (Critchley, 2013) . What that means is for example that in one study the control and experimental subjects were not well matched (i.e. they did not have the same starting weight, age, percentage of body fat etc.), while in other studies too few subjects were used for the results to be significant.

For the results of studies to be plausible one has to compare “apples with apples” (i.e. well-matched subjects and controls) and you need more than just a handful of subjects to produce the same result.

On the positive side, we can say that there is some evidence that Garcinia cambogia products may aid weight loss over a period of 12 weeks. No studies have been conducted for longer periods as yet (Marquez et al, 2012), which is also regarded as a drawback.

Safety issues

There is also at present an argument about the safety of pills containing Garcinia cambogia – one group of researchers slates the pills as dangerous and hepatotoxic (causing liver damage) (Kim et al, 2013), while another group refutes this (Clouatre Preuss, 2013). Marquez and his coworkers (2012) state that “at the doses usually administered, no differences have been reported in terms of side effects or adverse events (those studied) in humans between individuals treated with G. cambogia and controls.”  

Ano Lob (2009), a public health consultant in the United States has published a warning regarding the hepatotoxicity of a weight loss product called “Hydroxycut”, which contains Garcinia cambogia. The author collected case reports of patients who developed liver toxicity associated with the above mentioned weight loss product.

Evidently approximately one million units of this hydroxycitric acid product are sold per year in the USA. The patients who developed hepatotoxicity reported symptoms of fatigue, nausea, vomiting, cramps, fever, chills, abdominal pain, and jaundice.

While the number of hepatotoxicity cases reported were very few, Lob points out that monitoring of adverse events associated with dietary supplements such as these weight loss products is woefully inadequate in America (as is the case in many other countries, including South Africa), with the FDA only receiving about 1% of these negative reports.

According to Lob (2009), the Poison Control Centres in the USA are more likely to receive reports of adverse events associated with dietary supplements but are not equipped to coordinate such findings.

He cites the truly sobering example of a product called “Metabolife 356″ which was sold as a weight loss supplement in America. Lob’s states that the manufacturers received 14 000 reports over a period of five years that documented “serious adverse events associated with their ephedra-containing product” which included heart attacks, strokes, convulsions and fatalities.

The manufacturers did not inform the FDA or any other US government authority of these reports. As astounding as this may sound, manufacturers of dietary supplements are not required to meet any of the specifications that are strictly enforced when it comes to food and pharmaceutical products (medicines), so they can use this “ethical loophole” not to publish reports of negative and harmful events.

Eventually these events came to light and ephedra-containing products for slimming and other uses were banned in the USA.

The implication contain in Lob’s warning is that HCA or Garcinia cambogia extract may also be potentially toxic unless sufficient, reliable evidence to the contrary is made available.

Conclusion

At the present moment, we do not know enough about slimming products that contain Garcinia cambogia extract or HCA to freely recommend its use. I tend to agree with Astell and coworkers (2013) who conducted a systematic review of double blind randomised controlled clinical trials to assess the evidence available on the efficacy of current dietary supplements used to control appetite and/or weight.

These authors concluded that “According to the finding from this systematic review, the evidence is not convincing in demonstrating that most dietary supplements used as appetite suppressants for weight loss in the treatment of obesity are effective and safe.”

While we wait for more extensive and conclusive evidence obtained with larger numbers of well-matched test subjects treated for longer periods with the “gold standard” of double blind randomised controlled clinical trials, rather avoid using any weight-loss supplement that has not been tested thoroughly.

References:
(Astell KJ et al (2013). Plant extracts with appetite suppressing properties for body weight control: a systematic review of double blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Complement Ther Med, 21(4):407-16; Clouatre DL Preuss HG (2013). Hydroxycitric acid does not promote inflammation or liver toxicity. World J Gastoenterol. 19(44):8160-2; Crtichley G (2013). Garcinia cambogia – is it really a miracle weight loss supplement?; Lob A (2009). Hepatotoxicity associated with weight-loss supplements: A case for better post-marketing surveillance. World J Gastoenterol. 15(14):1786-1787; Marquez F et al (2012). Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of hydroxycitric acid or Garcinia cambogia extracts in humans. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 52(7):585-94)

Categories
Weight Loss Products

Garcinia Cambogia: Supplement Often Lacks Active Ingredient, Study Finds

Consumers who buy Garcinia cambogia, a weight-loss supplement made popular by Dr. Oz, may not be getting what they expect, recent laboratory testing show.

Laboratory tests found 21 of 29 of the top-selling Garcinia cambogia supplements sold online contain substantially less of the active ingredient, called hydroxycitric acid (HCA), than the label claims.

The results were released by an independent supplement testing company, called LabDoor, and have not been subject to peer review, the primary process for vetting scientific results. In addition, several supplement safety researchers who Live Science contacted for comment on the study would not discuss the findings, either because they are not peer-reviewed or because their company prohibits them from commenting on weight-loss drugs. (Without peer review, there is very little way for researchers to assess the validity and reliability of the claims, one researcher said.) [Dr. Oz’s Miracle Weight-Loss Pills: 5 Controversial Supplements]

Still, the results are consistent with those found by other independent labs that test supplements.

“I have seen substantial quality issues with Garcinia products and in some cases, there was not any HCA present in the products, while others had very low potency and a small number did meet label claim[s],” James Neal-Kababick, who was not involved in the new study, said in an email to Live Science. Neal-Kababick is the director of Flora Research Laboratories, a Food and Drug Administration-inspected testing lab in Oregon.

Even if the products did contain higher percentages of the active ingredient, there’s little evidence that the supplement actually helps people lose weight, said Neil Thanedar, the CEO of LabDoor. (On its website, LabDoor includes links to all the Garcinia weight-loss supplements tested and receives a 10 percent commission on all products purchased through their site, Thanedar said.)

Wild West of supplements

Garcinia cambogia, or Malabar tamarind, is a small, pumpkinlike gourd that grows in Asia and is often used to add a sour tang to curries and other foods. However, in recent years, extracts of Garcinia have become extremely popular after Dr. Oz claimed the food had an almost miraculous ability to melt the pounds away.

But the evidence is scarce: In test tubes, the active ingredient, HCA, can convert fat into sugar, and in a few animal studies, animals taking the extract weighed less and ate less food than those not given HCA. But studies in humans have found conflicting results, with one study finding a slightly higher weight loss in groups taking HCA compared with those taking a placebo; another found no improved weight loss. And a 2014 case report in the journal Medical Toxicology showed that taking Garcina together with antidepressants can cause serotonin syndrome, a potentially life-threatening condition.

Dietary supplements like Garcinia exist in the shadow of FDA regulation. Supplements are not subject to the same regulation as drugs — there is no requirement that manufacturers prove they actually work, and companies are not required to get FDA approval before marketing their goods.

Supplements are required to be correctly labeled, and to not be adulterated; for example, they are not allowed to contain drugs that require a prescription. However, the FDA usually only tests a product if it hears of complaints or cases of injury or illness as a result of a supplement.

Label versus not

To evaluate what was really in products labeled as Garcinia cambogia, LabDoor tested 29 of the most popular Garcinia supplements found on sites such as Amazon, or stores such as Vitamin Shoppe and GNC. They used a test called high-performance liquid chromatography to separate out the HCA in each of the samples.

Most of the samples contained far less than the 1,000 milligrams considered to be an “active dose.” In fact, some of the samples contained just 50 milligrams of HCA, Thanedar told Live Science.

For the worst performers, “What’s interesting is that it’s almost entirely filler,” Thanedar told Live Science.

Though the company did not test the fillers, these can include common additives and ingredients used in pills, such as the gelatin for the capsules, cellulose (a plant material), starch or sugar, Thanedar said.

The company has submitted some of its findings to the Federal Trade Commission, which regulates false advertising, and some manufacturers have already taken Garcinia supplements off the market, Thanedar said.

Common problem

The new findings aren’t surprising, Neal-Kababick said.

“As supply catches up or exceeds demand, the products usually are less of an issue, but during high demand and short supply, there is an increased risk of fraud. In one case, we found only maltodextrin [an artificial sugar] in a product and no detectable Garcinia,” Neal-Kababick said.

In addition, some of the methods that manufacturers may use to produce higher concentrations of HCA in a supplement can actually remove many of the “phytochemicals” that are normally found in the plant, he said. If that happens, the consumer is no longer getting a Garcinia extract, he said. (Phytochemicals are plant chemicals often responsible for color or smell, and some may be biologically active in the body.)

“What [consumers] are getting is a fractionated compound/purified compound of the botanical, which may not function the same as the botanical,” Neal-Kababick said.

Follow Tia Ghose on Twitter and Google+. Follow Live Science @livescience, Facebook  Google+. Original article on Live Science.