Categories
Weight Loss Products

The FTC just prosecuted a fake Amazon review for the first time — here’s what that means for users

<!– –>


VISIT CNBC.COM


Success

11 Hours Ago

Amazon boxes are seen stacked for delivery in New York City.

Thanks to fake reviews on sites like Amazon and Yelp, it can be hard to trust what you read. Now however, the US government has begun cracking down on fake user reviews posted on Amazon.

On Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission announced its first-ever charges against a company that paid to have fake reviews posted online. The company in question, New York-based Cure Encapsulations, paid the third-party website amazonverifiedreviews.com to write and post positive reviews that appeared to come from consumers for a weight-loss supplement product on Amazon.com, according to the FTC.

“Please make my product … stay a five star,” Cure Encapsulations owner Naftula Jacobowitz told amazonverifiedreviews.com, according to the FTC. Jacobowitz’s company paid for reviews falsely describing its product, the supplement garcinia cambogia, as a “powerful appetite suppressant” that “literally blocks fat from forming,” the FTC says.

Will it make reviews more trustworthy?

The FTC “does not comment about what future actions it may or may not take,” a spokesperson told CNBC Make It. But the fact that the FTC brought the case has already sparked speculation that the case sets the precedent that the federal government is now willing to bring charges against companies that pay for fake reviews making misleading claims.



How this young Indiana couple stole $1.2 million from Amazon



Fake online reviews are a common problem on e-commerce sites like Amazon and have also shown up on online review platforms like Yelp. Still, roughly 86 percent of consumers still regularly read online reviews, and a majority of people say that positive reviews make them more likely to use a local business, according to a BrightLocal survey.

Cases like the FTC’s settlement with Cure Encapsulations should make it easier for consumers to trust online reviews on sites like Amazon, according to Paul Alan Levy, an attorney who works for the consumer-advocacy group Public Citizen.

“I think it gives consumers more reason to place trust in what they see on these review sites, certainly,” Levy tells CNBC Make It.

“The administrative agencies, like the FTC and state attorneys general, are in an excellent position to do investigations and figure out when there are false positive [reviews] out there, and it’s good that the FTC is doing that, because it creates a sort of pressure on avoiding false positive reviews,” he tells CNBC Make It.

Squashing fake reviews

Levy notes that, in the past, e-commerce companies and review sites have sometimes taken matters into their own hands when looking to squash fake reviews. Amazon itself has filed numerous lawsuits in recent years against sellers who post false reviews, as well as third-party companies that sell the service of posting fake reviews. Amazon estimated last year that “less than 1 percent of reviews are inauthentic” on the site.

“We welcome the FTC’s work in this area,” an Amazon spokesperson told The Verge. “Amazon invests significant resources to protect the integrity of reviews,” but “even one inauthentic review is one too many.” (The company also announced a new program, called Project Zero, targeting counterfeit goods on the site on Thursday.)

Yelp also has its own Consumer Alerts program that tries to catch businesses that post fake reviews.

Of course, Levy also points out that consumers should still take online reviews with a grain of salt.

“The wisdom of the crowd on review sites has value for consumers,” he says, “[but] you should never take a single review as gospel, whether it be a five-star review or a one-star review.” Instead, he says, look for a pattern of reviews.

The FTC case

The FTC filed its complaint against Cure Encapsulations last week, after finding that the company had paid for the fabricated reviews, which purported to be written by actual customers and which made “false and unsubstantiated claims” about its products. While the extract garcinia cambogia is often claimed to be effective for weight-loss, the National Institutes of Health has noted that there is “no convincing evidence” that it can help you lose weight.

Cure Encapsulations has already reached a settlement with the FTC in which the company has agreed to never again make “weight-loss, appetite-suppression, fat-blocking, or disease-treatment claims” for any product without substantiating those claims with “competent and reliable scientific evidence,” the FTC says. The settlement also prohibits the company from misrepresenting endorsements, including reviews that falsely claim to come from an actual customer.

“People rely on reviews when they’re shopping online,” Andrew Smith, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. “When a company buys fake reviews to inflate its Amazon ratings, it hurts both shoppers and companies that play by the rules.”

Correction: This article was revised to correct Cure Encapsulation’s location. The company is headquartered in New York.

Don’t Miss:

How to start a successful Amazon business, from a seller who’s making millions

Like this story? Subscribe to CNBC Make It on YouTube!



This high school dropout brought in $18 million last year selling on Amazon



a:after {content: “203A”;font-size:1.25em;margin-left:1px;}
.wildcard .prime_promo_module h3.content-title{font-size:20px;line-height:26px;}
@media screen and (max-width: 600px){
.video-wrapper {display: inline-block;width: 47%;}
}
@media screen and (max-width: 530px){
.wildcard .prime_promo_module {margin: 20px 10px!important;}
.wildcard .prime_promo_module .sourceName.top a {font-size: 14px; color:white;}
.video-wrapper { display: inline-block;width: 100%;}
.poster-wrapper {max-width: 100%;}
.video-info {margin-left: 0px;width: 100%;max-width: 530px;}
.prime_promo_module i.fa.fa-video {font-size: 3.5em;margin: 55px 105px;}
.prime_promo_module .top{margin:0px;}
body[id*=makeit] .show-name.top a {font-size: 14px;}
h3.content-title {font-size: 22px;line-height: 26px;}
.immersive article .tuneIn p {font-size: 15px;}
}
]]>


Playing

Share this video…

Watch Next…

i_am_old_ie = true;

Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

Data also provided by

© 2019 CNBC LLC. All Rights Reserved. A Division of NBCUniversal

Categories
Weight Loss Products

A scourge of fake reviews is hitting Amazon, Walmart and other major retailers

Fake reviews are increasingly prevalent across many top retailer websites, according to a study from Fakespot, which analyzes online customer reviews for fake or unreliable reviews.

  • 52 percent of reviews posted on Walmart.com are “inauthentic and unreliable,” Fakespot estimates
  • 30 percent of Amazon reviews are fake or unreliable, the study found
  • About a third of reviews on makeup retailer Sephora and video-game service Steam are also unreliable or fake, the analysis discovered
  • “My advice is to be very skeptical” when reading online reviews, said Saoud Khalifah, CEO of Fakespot

The fake reviews threaten to undermine the credibility of retailers struggling with the influx, according to Fakespot, which uses algorithms to look for patterns of deception in reviews. Manufacturers are eager to earn 5-star reviews that can push their products to the top of a search result on Amazon, for instance, with some turning to trickery to make their products stand out. 

“You need a lot of good positive reviews to convince people to check out their products,” said Khalifah, who wrote a software program to detect fake reviews after getting tricked himself by glowing reviews for a sleep supplement. After the supplement didn’t work, he realized many of those positive reviews were fake. 

Khalifah said his research “tells me that 1 in 3 reviews on any of these platform is highly unreliable. They have been influenced by people at the company [making or marketing the product that’s sold on the website] or written by people hired by the company. There is a lot of bias in the reviews.”

Increase in fake reviews hitting Walmart, Amazon, and other retailers

For instance, companies will send postcards to people who recently purchased a product on Amazon, promising them a gift card to the site if they write a 5-star review that gets published. Other companies hire professional reviewers to post glowing reviews, while some use bots to post fake reviews en masse.   

In the case of the postcards offering gift cards in exchange for top reviews, Fakespot’s Khalifah says the customer reviews are still problematic. In some cases, the offers are only valid if the review is posted within a few days of the purchase, but that may not give a consumer enough time to test the product and figure out of it performs as advertised.

“These influenced reviews are degrading the quality of your online shopping experience,” he says. 

Legal action

In a statement sent to CBS MoneyWatch, Walmart said it recognizes that reviews are “an important part of the Walmart shopping experience.” It added that it moderates all reviews. “If we do not believe a review is from an actual customer, we immediately remove it from our site,” the company said. 

Amazon said it invests “significant resources” in maintaining the quality of its reviews. “Even one inauthentic review is one too many,” the company said in a statement sent to CBS MoneyWatch. 

Winery owner sues Google over bad reviews

It noted it has posted participation guidelines for reviewers and companies that sell on its site, and it added that it suspends, bans and takes legal action against those who violate its policies.

Amazon said it uses a combination of investigators and automation to root out inauthentic reviews. “We estimate more than 90 percent of inauthentic reviews are computer generated, and we use machine learning technology to analyze all incoming and existing reviews 24/7 and block or remove inauthentic reviews,” the company said.

Sephora and Steam’s parent company, Valve, didn’t immediately return requests for comment.

How to detect fake reviews

Fake reviews started proliferating several years ago, but show no sign of letting up, Khalifah says. While they may seem like a nuisance, they have the potential to mislead consumers about the quality of products. And consumers tend to rely on those reviews for purchasing advice, with about 84 percent of consumers saying they trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations, Fakespot said. 

Consumers can plug in the URL of a product into Fakespot’s website, which grades the reviews from A to F and provides insights into whether a retailer has removed reviews, a sign that some of the reviews may have been fake or biased. One popular external battery on Amazon, for instance, earned a “D” rating from Fakespot, which determined that fewer than 44 percent of the reviews were reliable.

Consumers can also eyeball reviews on their own for signs of deception. Khalifah says red flags include:

  • A one-day surge in five-star reviews
  • Broken grammar
  • Reviews from reviewers who post hundreds of reviews in one day

It’s not only that companies are faking glowing reviews, but companies are hiring people or using bots to also post fake “bad” reviews for competitors. A sudden rash of 1-star reviews for a product could be a sign of sabotage, for instance.

“We believe the review system is broken,” Khalifah said. “People still don’t realize how much the review system is gamed.”

The Federal Trade Commission is watching, too. On Tuesday it announced its first case against a marketer’s use of phony paid reviews on an independent retail website. Cure Encapsulations Inc. settled FTC allegations it made false and unsubstantiated claims for its garcinia cambogia weight-loss supplement through a third-party website the agency said was paid to write and post fake reviews on Amazon.com.

“When a company buys fake reviews to inflate its Amazon ratings, it hurts both shoppers and companies that play by the rules,” Andrew Smith, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement.  

Categories
Weight Loss Products

FTC said supplement marketer paid for fake reviews on Amazon

A marketer of a weight loss supplement accused of paying a third-party website years ago to post dozens of fake reviews of the product on Amazon has reached an agreement with FTC to settle a complaint.

A proposed court order settling the complaint also would resolve allegations that New York-based Cure Encapsulations Inc. and its owner, Naftula Jacobowitz, made false and unsubstantiated claims for its Garcinia Cambogia supplement on its Amazon product page, including through the purchased reviews.

For example, the supplement was described as a “powerful appetite suppressant” and “Literally BLOCKS FAT From Forming,” according to an FTC news release. The government further alleged the defendants made various false and unsubstantiated claims related to weight loss, including the product causes up to 20 pounds of weight loss.

In a prepared statement emailed by its outside attorney, August Horvath of Foley Hoag LLP, Cure Encapsulations asserted it made its weight loss claims “in good faith based on prevailing scientific and medical information available to the general public at that time, including strong endorsements by reputable professionals such as Dr. Mehmet Oz.”

“The FTC believes there is little or no scientific evidence that Garcinia Cambogia helps with significant weight loss,” the statement acknowledged. “We settled this case to resolve our disagreement with the FTC over whether there is evidence that Garcinia Cambogia helps with weight loss, and it remains just that—a disagreement.”

In a phone interview with Natural Products INSIDER, Horvath said “the science may be different now” from when the claims were made.

“My client made those [claims] in good faith at the time based on the information that was out there,” he explained.

Under the consent order with FTC, Cure Encapsulations said, “[W]e will no longer claim that GC [Garcinia Cambogia] blocks fat formation, powerfully suppresses appetite or causes rapid and substantial or significant (more than 20 pounds) weight loss, but that does not mean that we ever made these claims dishonestly.”

Fake reviews on Amazon

In at least one respect, FTC’s case was not a typical investigation. In the Feb. 26 news release, the agency disclosed it was the first one “challenging a marketer’s use of fake paid reviews on an independent retail website.”

The defendants allegedly paid a website—amazonverifiedreviews.com—to develop and post reviews of the product on Amazon.

“That website offered Amazon sellers the ability to ‘Push your product towards the top!’ using ‘verified’ product reviews that will ‘help your product rank better in the internal search engine,’” FTC alleged in its complaint.

Jacobowitz advised the site’s operator he needed at least a 4.3 out of 5 stars, according to the agency’s news release.

“People rely on reviews when they’re shopping online,” said Andrew Smith, director of FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. “When a company buys fake reviews to inflate its Amazon ratings, it hurts both shoppers and companies that play by the rules.”

The complaint suggested Jacobowitz requested 30 reviews.

Horvath explained the reason for the purported purchases of reviews: “My client was the target of negative fabricated reviews being posted by one of its competitors.”

He suggested competitors attacking each other through fabricated reviews was a trend at Amazon at the time.

Asked whether Jacobowitz was denying whether the reviews he paid for were fake, Horvath responded, “The client’s not admitting or denying that either way … I don’t think my client has complete insight into how this vendor functioned.”

According to FTC’s complaint, in one email written by Jacobowitz to the third-party website, he expressed the following concern: “Because of my upcoming holiday, I will not be able to watch my reviews not … get sabotaged by competition.”

The competition’s goal, he added in the email, “is to bring me down to a 4.2 overall rating, and I need to be at 4.3 overall in order to have the sales.”

Among the Amazon reviews FTC alleged were fabricated:

  • “Wow. I’m actually still amazed that it worked way faster than I expected. I have lost 20 pounds by using these amazing capsules. The pills help you with your intake of food, cleans all toxins from your body and does not allow fat or sugar to stick. Highly recommended!”
     
  • I am in-love with this product. It is amazingly simple to use but extremely effective. I lost around 8 pounds in roughly weeks of use and best part of it is I don’t get hungry. I have also noticed that i have been feeling amazing everyday since i began using the pill. Best of all, i have noticed no negative side effects and have had great weight loss results.”
     
  • “At first I was skeptical about purchasing these since they aren’t exactly cheap supplements, but I can tell you that these supplements really do work, and I based my purchase off of findings and research. I have lost 10 pounds in the first week of using these. I will definitely be recommending this to my family and friends.”

Cure Encapsulations allegedly purchased the reviews between October 2014 and June 2015. The company described the number of suspected fake reviews as “minimal” and reported they were swiftly “removed from amazon.com.”

“We regret that one of our employees engaged in such acts since it opposes our ethical standards,” the company said in its statement. Cure Encapsulations has “received more than 12,000 real reviews from real people, and we adhere to a strict code of conduct,” the statement added.

The third-party website, Horvath said, is out of business and was sued by Amazon in 2016. The website is no longer accessible. 

The lawyer described false reviewers like the one outlined in the government’s complaint as “the low-hanging fruit four or five years ago,” though he suggested issues remain with reviews on Amazon.

“But the plays people are making now are much more sophisticated than this,” Horvath said. “It’s kind of late to be enforcing this type of low-hanging fruit in the Amazon review industry.”

Amazon targeted more than 1,000 alleged fake reviewers in three separate lawsuits, CNET reported in 2016

“We will continue to pursue legal action against the root cause of reviews abuse — the sellers and manufacturers who create the demand for fraudulent reviews,” a spokeswoman for Amazon said in a written statement at the time to CNET, “as well as the ecosystem of individuals and organizations who supply fraudulent reviews.”

In response to FTC’s announcement this week, a spokesperson for Amazon welcomed the agency’s “work in this area.”

“Amazon invests significant resources to protect the integrity of reviews in our store because we know customers value the insights and experiences shared by fellow shoppers,” the spokesperson said in a statement to INSIDER. “We have clear participation guidelines for both reviewers and selling partners and we suspend, ban and take legal action on those who violate our policies.”

Proposed order

A proposed court order for a permanent injunction and monetary judgment against Cure Encapsulations and Jacobowitz has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

The order would bar the defendants from making certain claims—including statements related to weight loss, appetite suppression, fat blocking and disease treatment—for any dietary supplement, food or drink unless they have human clinical tests to support the claims, FTC said. The defendants also must possess “competent and reliable scientific evidence” to substantiate any claims related to the efficacy or health benefits of the products above, the agency said.

Furthermore, Cure Encapsulations and Jacobowitz have agreed to:

  • email consumers who purchased the product, describing the government’s allegations regarding their efficacy claims; and
     
  • notify Amazon Inc. that they paid for reviews of their “Quality Encapsulations Garcinia Cambogia” capsules and identify such reviews.

Although the proposed order imposes a judgment of US$12.8 million, it will be suspended upon payment of $50,000 to FTC. The full amount of the judgment becomes due if the court finds the defendants misrepresented their financial condition.